Not the case in reality. As I mentioned in my original response - the system is archaic.
If you are checking each quarter and doing averages - but have not changed all criteria equally then the law of averages does NOT work.
In other words - for a whole year existing averages are calculated:-
1. Minimum total stays for 12 months.
2. 10 completed stays between Jul 1, 2020 and Jun 30, 2021
- or - 100 nights over at least 3 completed stays
In COVID ridden 2020 - we had ZERO stays in 2 quarters and in 2 quarters we did meet the 10 completed stays requirement. However these stays were NOT divided equally. The last quarter had a long term guest (25 days) and 3 others with lesser length stays, one of who left a 5 star review "after" the cut off for the "assessment"
Therefore in the "April" quarter - we had a 4.7 average because we had ONE guest of the 5
leave a 4 star review, 3 leave 5 star reviews and 1 leave a 5 star review -"after" assessment.
(5+5+4)/3)) = 4.67 ≠ (5+5+5+4)/4 the answer of which is 4.75 (meets criteria)
So net result - we still maintain our very high 4.9 overall rating standard .....(as you can see on my profile) - but now have 'Super Host" yanked out .... because Airbnb have an outdated system of rating hosts.
In a fair world - they would not just "high handedly" change one criteria in the averages system - but "logically" change - calculations based on history and overall performance of host. In my case have held "super host" status from the day they chose to initiate the program......
Just my 1 CENT.