Hi @Catherine-Powell,
Thank you for this update - these are excellent steps!
However, I do agree with many commenters: Revenge reviews are a problem that needs to be solved. It goes against a basic human concept of fairness when rule-breakers are allowed to attack and damage those who fairly hold them to account.
I think the key is being able to quickly and objectively identify guests who break Key House Rules, and to disable their ability to post a review until the case can be reviewed.
Here's my 4-step suggestion (written mostly with unauthorized parties in mind):
1. Reduce/Eliminate Subjectivity
Currently, the "Events Allowed" Key House Rule is undefined, and the Party & Events Policy is permissive and subjective in only prohibiting "disruptive" parties. There is no way for a host to objectively deem a party "disruptive"; the only objective measure is if neighbors complain or call the police. The policy is also one-size-fits-all in terms of setting a maximum size of gatherings at 16, which might be OK for a large house, but of course ridiculous for a studio apartment.
Why get into what is (or isn't) a party, or what is (or isn't) disruptive, when it all boils down to the number of people at a listing, and whether it's noisy, at what hours?
--> Eliminate the "Events Allowed" Key House Rule radio button; replace it with:
--> Add a setting where hosts set a limit on the number of daytime guests (in addition to the maximum overnight guests).
--> Add a setting where hosts can define Quiet Hours at the listing; with an objective definition of "quiet" such as no sound audible at the property line of a house, or outside the walls/doors of an apartment or private/shared room.
2. Increase and Define Consequences.
Currently, there are few consequences for rule-breaking, unless there’s damage, or a neighbor complains. Negative guest reviews don’t matter much to partiers. There simply isn’t enough deterrent.
--> Add a feature in Key House Rules that allows hosts to specify flat-fee fines and when breaking a particular Key House Rule is grounds for cancelling a guest’s booking.
3. Allow Instant Reporting & Disable Guest Ability to Review.
It's great that hosts will be able to cancel Instant Bookings where guests admit upfront, that they’re going to throw a party, but it’s been my sad experience that the worst party-throwers are the most evasive. Party throwers will continue to get through preventive measures. When this happens, hosts need a way to instantly, and in-the-moment, report guests who are throwing parties, WITHOUT needing to talk to a live Airbnb rep.
Hosts need a “Party-In-Progress”, or “Instant Report” tool that will:
o Allow hosts to report all necessary details (date, number of guests, noise, police involvement, etc.), upload proof (photos, complaint texts, et.), and choose whether they want to implement consequence specified for breaking the particular Key House Rule (e.g. “Yes, please charge this guest the $100 fine”).
o Disable the guest’s ability to write a review.
o Notify the guest of the report against their booking and the consequences imposed, pending review.
4. Conduct a Timely Review
Airbnb then reviews the situation in the days* to follow. If the host’s report is upheld, the consequences are implemented, and the guest continues to be blocked from posting a review. If the host’s report is rejected, the guest is then able to post a review, but warned about using it to retaliate against the host. (* or on escalated/immediate/emergency basis, if the situation is serious and host is requesting that the guest’s booking is cancelled immediately.)
-----------------
I hope there’s a way to do something along these lines. Thank you for all you’re doing for hosts, and double-thanks for reading this far!
Becky