Hi @Kia272 ,
You bring up an interesting perspective.
In my region (Scandinavia), we’ve often discussed how ranking systems can have unintended effects. Research in positive psychology, such as studies by Hans Henrik Knoop from Aalborg University, Denmark, shows that systems based on top ratings tend to only motivate those who receive the highest recognition. For others, missing out on "top marks" can be demotivating and reduce their willingness to contribute further.
Applied to Airbnb's "Top Contributor" system, there’s a real risk that active contributors—like those at Level 10, whose contributions have clearly brought value to this community—might feel less inclined to engage if they don’t receive recognition. Instead of fostering more participation, it could unintentionally discourage those who aren’t highlighted.
At the same time, recognition does have its merits—and I must admit, it’s a bit embarrassing to say. Being recognized as a "Top Contributor" has motivated me to engage more actively, even though I often feel too busy to participate. That said, I can easily imagine feeling the opposite if I’d received a "lower score" this time, so to speak. And it’s truly thought-provoking to consider if all the incredibly inspiring people in this community—regardless of their level—who I learn from every time I come here, might feel the same way.
This raises an important question: how can the system ensure that all contributors feel valued and motivated to continue sharing their insights and experiences?
Best regards,
Karen
