Since when does a company have the right to water down my decision that I can't - can NOT, will NOT - host children?
This whole discrimination issue is becoming ridiculous to the point that it is discriminating hosts.
Guests often don't read properly or at all, so why open the door to somebody appearing on your doorstep with a little one while you said you didn't/couldn't host them. There's reason for that, and it's not right to then question that decision and open up doors of 'maybe'. Many, esp. new hosts, don't have the stamina yet to address people directly at the door because they are breaking a rule or two and thus might have to be re-located. This community forum is full of hosts letting themselves be run over and then calling for help.
Seriously, what if a host DID let somebody with a toddler into their non-childproofed home because ABB said 'MAY not be safe....' and the parent decided What the heck, do it anyway, and that child then fell down a long flight of stairs?? or pulled something out of a shelf and something heavy from higher up crashed down on their head??
Would ABB take the brunt? Not sure about that.
I'm saving my energy and not protesting it, but my house rules have a clear NO to children for good reason. And guests automatically accept those too when booking.
My advice to all hosts is to use this option if you're not happy with ABB overriding your decision.
What's next?
There's still a few options open:
MAY be non-smoking
MAYBE no parties or events
MAY not be suitable for pets