@Tharusha0
I'm really not sure why this host is a Superhost. It doesn't make sense to me.
One of the criteria is that you have to have hosted at least 10 stays OR 100 nights over at least 3 stays in the previous year. The last assessment would have covered the period ending 31st March, yet this host only has one review for this whole period, i.e. one in March from Mrs M. That's weird.
Sure, there could have been nine other guests who stayed or enough long term stays to meet the criteria, but how come none of these guests, only Mrs M, left a review? Even if a host deletes a listing, the reviews will still appear on their profile. One logical explanation is that Mrs M booked enough stays to make up the numbers but only left one review.
Anyway, for whatever reason, the host gets awarded Superhost at the beginning of April. There are then a number of reviews from different guests. They are all nice reviews, but a few mention some issues, especially the location not being as described. Now, should a few of these guests leave 4* instead of 5*, that would very soon drop the host below the 4.8* required for Superhost. Then comes along Mrs M, who booked at least 19 times after those other guests had stayed, conveniently all in June, right before the next assessment, which covers the period to 30th June.
Again, I am just speculating, but this looks extremely fishy to me.
It's a shame really as the apartments themselves look nice and the guests seem to like them overall. If the host just accurately described the location and didn't try to con people out of deposits, he/she would probably do very well.