Linda, I haven't mentioned race or religion so I think you're showing your prejudice by using a 'slippery slope' argument, but I think it would be totally fair to say that if a host doesn't make the effort to create, and indicate, a safe space for travellers of protected groups (if AirBnB offered that option) that it would be reasonable for a traveller from that group to choose another option, and assume that space is not safe for them.
Ensuring that LGBT travellers feel safe, and know their sexuality or gender identity is not going to be an endangering or discomfort-causing factor during their stay, is not 'discrimination' - nor is it illegal to 'discriminate' *for* a protected group. That's why they're protected, because they're already descriminated against.
It is unfair (and currently does not work) to expect an LGBT guest to discuss the specifics of what constitutes a safe and comfortable trip for them, with every host they make a booking request to. It's also unfair for LGBT hosts to have to leave a reference to their LGBT status in their listing in the hope that someone reads it, when it would clearly be a big factor in a guest's choice of place to stay if they could easily seach for it (or even keywords!).
These factors include, but are not limited to:
- Same-sex partners can share a bed without a problem.
- No residents in or visitors to the property during your stay hold, communicate or enact discriminatory views against LGBT people
- Hosts are able to provide advice about local safe social spaces, and local customs, to improve personal safety for LGBT guests
- Guests can use bathrooms of their preferred gender, where relevant.
- Guests will be safe from discrimination and violence in shared areas of the property (e.g. pool or common room)