@Marie82
Indeed !!! I, for one, would be interested to read a report on how the black community in general currently gets round the implicit vetting process on AirBnb and similar platforms. A vetting process which given the level of violence in your country , is even more critical to analyse step by step.
Obviously as a party house owner renting from time to time to the ( french and even swiss) black community I know some elements of answer to this question !
By "implicit vetting process" I mean all the elements which NON BLACKS currently use to deselect or ostracize "higher risk guests" when deciding on whom they are going to rent to to.
Implicit ostracism can take place either before reservation thru mail exchange ( assuming the owner is NOT on instant booking) and after reservation when some elements of identity and address ( whether true or false is another matter) are unveiled .to the house owner with the consequence that he/she will decide to cancel the reservation on frivolous or unmotivated ground ( in order to drown our famous fish !!!) .
Your idea is good but of no use in this particular case.
Why is it a good idea ?
If all of you (american hosts,) had the opportunity to bring AirBnb to Court in a Class Action to hold the company accountable for all sorts of breaches to consumer law and protection including negligence and defectuosity of the app (as explained in my recent "tentative pleading" ) , you could use this argument of yours to refute AirBnb's plea that their booking procedure makes it materially impossible to vet black guests on the basis of the colour of their skin.
You could prove that such self-congratulation on the part of AirBnb is mere PR bull**bleep**. Either by bringing to the Court a cartography of AirBnb party houses showing that owners living close enough to black communities tend to avoid renting their houses for parties ( that would probably require some serious university research into the matter ) . Or by producing host testimonies which say exactly what you wrote.
But it is not an argument for the debates on the Orinda killing since judges will not discuss what would have happened, had the house owner decided not to rent to the organizer (and therefore had rent to another person, whether of white, yellow or black complexion).