Doesn't this mean that with only 3 in 50 giving you 4* you will fail to make Superhost? (Or worse if anyone does 3* or less).
One issue I see at the moment is that guests are inconsistent in their ratings, and we hosts have to fawn over them to keep up the 5*, even some poor and disrespectful guests who will now go on to other hosts houses and not live up to their 5* ratings.
eg1. We were given 3* by a guest who says she ranks 3* for average, 4* for excellent and 5* for above and beyond, "for example I only gave 5* to one host who had dinner cooked for me and my family upon arrival" .... whoa!
eg2. We got 4* because a guest said he had to stand outside while trying to contact us to gain entry. However we sent lockbox instructions the day before as well as the instructions being in the house info.
eg3. We got 3* because the guest said the fridge magnets and guitar were a huge pain for his kinds. However the listing specifically says the house isn't kid friendly and to ask if you have questions about suitability.