Hi everyone. This has been on my mind and I was wondering what people thought. Please know when I lay out my thought here I'm not meaning to cause conflict, argument, strife etc - though I recognise that not everyone will agree.
It seems to me that more and more posts and comments and listings (in some areas anyway) are property management and 'supernumary whole flat listings'. People are investing in flats to do short term lettings. It's profitable. Companies love it as they can set up systems etc as there are fewer variables perhaps than with a shared listing. And the platform is well known so offers great exposure. Good business deal for them. (This is not to say that all whole flat hostings are 'impersonal' !!)
It also seems to me that many local intiatives and objections to the platform of AirBNB (and similar) are because those councils/areas view such whole flat short term rentals as competition for longer term rentals/stable housing prices.
But the lead comes down on the head of the sharing host in many ways. Continual legal battles between AirBNB and local districts will naturally raise fees, people who join AirBNB will see lots and lots of 'cookie cutter/agency staged' listings and not get it when they book a shared listing, etc.
I do realise that different strokes are for different folks - some people really want to share, some people really want a space - this isn't about competition between the two offerings.
But worry that the massive influx of whole flat listings has not only an effect on local stability of housing but also the view that AirBNB was originally a sharing/personal contact kind of endeavor, which would have a greater negative effect on sharing hosts.
I am obviously seeing this from my POV - as a sharing host - so I welcome other views.
Have a great evening from London UK 🙂