I'm not happy about the policy change of accept or be penalised. Decline, be penalised. Respond to to a prospective guests without doing either, is not recognised as contacting the guest.
Recently I had contact with a guy in Hawaii - I live in Sydney - different timezones. I requested he get verified with passport or license before being willing to accept the request. I then get a threatening email from AIR bnb saying that I would have week of my calendar blocked if I didn't either accept or decline. I take offence to this and I've had a conversation with an Air bnb staff member but it didn't seem he could do anything about this new policy other than pass it on. But how do I know somebody at Air BNB is considering the hosts position on this?
Once again I reiterate, if a host requires further information before they accept and the prospective guest does not get back within the 24 hr period, taking into account that sometimes there are different time zones which impact on the possible response time, then hosts are threatened with losing a much earned status of Super Host and potential earnings if the calendar is blocked for a week as punishment. Enquiries from the other side of the world means communication may take more than 24 hrs due to each person sleeping at different times. That a host responds by email without accepting, should be a clear indication that the needs of prospective guests is considered. Hosts should have the right to feel safe, a sense of security when booking guests and that may require more legitimate verification, especially when guests may not have used Air BNB before and are new, or have few reviews. I’m really not happy about this and think the policy needs to be reviewed quickly. Is anybody else aware of this?