I posted this in another thread earlier-
Unfortunately the greatest financial need and income are two completely different things. For example, if I have lost £10,000 from the result of cancellations and no future bookings from the coronavirus but have made £50,000 in the year prior does that make me financially vulnerable? These large amounts suggest I have a rather nice property or two to rent out, to me one would assume i was never that financially in need in the first place. On the flip side someone who has lost £1500 and makes about £15000 a year would suggest more of a reliance on Airbnb as an income. OR this could be all relative and no one would truly know for sure who is most in need.
One piece of criteria to obtain the grant is to show a reliance on Airbnb being a major income. But how can one prove that? By having the advantage of having a nice property or two where one can charge a large amount does not show that host of being more reliant compared to someone with 1 property who earns a lot less. How can it? "Hey, this host has just lost £15000 in earnings in the same period compared to this guy who has lost just £1500, therefore the higher earner needs this grant the most!", errrr, no. That's not how it works.
The more I think of the grant the more flawed I think it is. If Airbnb truly wants to know who is in financial need the most going by how much a host has lost this is not the way to go about it. I fear many hosts truly in need are about to be greatly disappointed.