I had a Saturday night in January blocked on my calendar and...
Latest reply
I had a Saturday night in January blocked on my calendar and contacted AIRBNB asking for their help opening the date and to ...
Latest reply
Hi, I have a doubt about the following programme: Superhost Relief Fund
All the superhosts with the requirements required (almost one year with the superhost title, no more than 2 announcements under the same profile, profile with identity verified) will receive the invitation to apply to the programme or a previous selection will be done?
I think that generaly every host and superhost of houses and of experiences is very affected by this situation and potentially everyone could have reasons to access the fund. But cannot satisfy everyone and I think it is mainly used as propaganda and there is not transparency aboutthe criterias for access to the fund. Initially it was said that the requirements to compete are verified identity, not more than two ads and to be superhost for at least a year (really they specified at least four times and it was not necessary to be consecutive). In this way they created many expectations and then now they send invitations to super hosts with at least 3/4 years of status. It may be a criterion but it was better that they said that it is a fund for longtime superhost and not for superhost with more needs; how do they determine that a 3/4 year old superhost needs more than a 1/2 year old superhost if they don't even invite him? For this reason I think that this fund will not be assigned with real criteria of necessity and will be used above all as propaganda and advertising.
Sorry for my bad English, I hope I made myself understood.
@Moreno-and-Stefania0 No, not all Superhosts will receive an invitation- it's a selection process, supposedly based on "need", but now it seems that how Airbnb determines "need" is quite suspect. See @Susan17's post about halfway down this thread :
Hi Sarah, do you have any idea about the criterias that Airbnb uses to determines the most needed superhosts before sending the invitation?
They have updated the information to say they will be basing this criteria on lost Airbnb income (comparing this year to last, or something like that) but I have no idea if that means those who have lost the biggest percentage of their Airbnb income or the largest amount of income in $$.
Also, although previously, the article said you needed to be a Superhost for a year or more (not nearly a year as you mentioned), the update says that they will focus first on those who have been Superhosts for four or more years.
Update after Brian Chesky's latest video to hosts.
"
Another topic that’s come up a lot in our global listening sessions is the Superhost Relief Fund, which was created to help some of our most experienced hosts who are struggling financially.
.
Brian Chesky also said in yesterday's video:
This applies to superhosts who offer homes
and
we're also applying this to experience (d) hosts as well“.
.
You could be right. But I didn't know someone can become a Superhost by achieving an average 4.8* + rating due to experiences.
@Ute42 I think the grant is for Superhosts and Experience hosts. That's what is stated, anyway. The Experience host doesn't also have to be a Superhost.
I wonder why this is? I am not belittling Experience hosts at all, but why would they be entitled to this fund as opposed to, say someone who had been a Superhost for 3.5 years?
I know a lot of others won't agree, but I get why this fund isn't for everyone as it's actually not that much money. It's already nowhere near enough to go round for Superhosts, so it makes sense to put additional criteria on it like being a Superhost for four or more years, but why Experience hosts? What makes them so deserving compared to others? Have they invested more in their business? Are they likely to have the highest outgoings to cover?
Or, is it because the money losing Experiences programme is reportedly one of Brian Chesky's pet projects? He seems determined to save it even though it was apparently not profitable before COVID-19.
@Huma0 Your last sentence could certainly be the reason. Maybe it's intended to make more hosts sign up to host experiences, since they just introduced "Online Experiences". And maybe they just couldn't come up with yet a third fund to assist hosts, so they stuck the Experience hosts in there so they wouldn't start jumping up and down ranting about how they'd been overlooked.
I could be wrong, but this whole online experiences idea seems a bit far fetched to me. There are already so many channels offering people content for free and often times from people already well versed in producing this kind of stuff online, like Youtubers with thousands of followers. I am not sure Airbnb can compete.
Sure, Experience hosts could be upset to be left out, but so could many other hosts who don't fit the Superhost for one year, four years, with X number of listings etc. or whatever Airbnb eventually decide it is.
The difference is, to be a Superhost, especially for a prolonged period of time, you've probably had to put in a lot of effort and you've proved yourself to some extent. That's not to say that there aren't many amazing and deserving hosts out there who don't have the status, as we know how flawed the whole review system is. However, at least it's a criteria with some measurements to it.
I really don't know much about hosting experiences as it's something I never had time to look into properly. I assume there is also a review system in place, so are the Experience hosts selected to apply for the fund also expected to have received a certain percentage of 5 star review over a long period of time, or does it not matter for them?
Like I said, this whole thing is too cloak and dagger for my liking.