Hi @Lizzie,
Whatever qualifications will apply to any badge. There will always be discussions around it. As the base for the numbers is already subjective.
I’ve seen comments by guests, that it seems almost all hosts are Superhosts (So in their perception, it does not mean that much). I’ve seen other comments by hosts, that the current qualification rules around Superhost are too difficult to achieve and/or to maintain. So who is right?
For by far the majority of all Superhosts. It will take just that 1 bad host-guest encounter, to have that badge ripped of your chest for at least a year. Even on this community I have witnessed very quickly escalated ‘discussions’ in various threads. Which in the end even had to be closed by you. In order to stop the ever escalating quarrel. Exactly the same can happen quickly in a host-guest encounter (but then the threshold to enter a possible discussion is even lower). My experience: Most guests are a walk in the park on a shiny day (but keep an eye on where you go). And a few are like tip-toeing.
In order to make a proper assessment of the qualification criteria, one would require proper insight in the associated data. Airbnb has all that data. But they are setting on top of it, like a hen on a full basket with eggs 😞
So my best guess is, that it should be something similar to the Superhost qualification rules.
1 very important thing to look at, will be the difference between the average host-rating (So rated by guests) and the average guest-rating (So rated by hosts). I would not be surprised when the average guest-rating is actually higher than the average host-rating. A lot of hosts give guests a relative high star rating, out of fear of retaliation (I know that mutual reviews are only up for display, once both reviews have been submitted). As you may be aware, there are various other ways to hurt people. By using different internet functionality. It is even been heard of, where guests were successful in having a bad review on them. To be taken down by Airbnb. As that guest was successful in convincing an Airbnb CSR that the review was not in line with Airbnb policies for instance.
So I’m quite curious what Airbnb will come up with, later this year. When the qualifications for Superguest are made public. I hope it will at least be a bit better than the rules around the famous 48-hour grace period (I had my first Free of Charge Cancellation within the first 14 days of May, How odd is that).
I would definitely like to see: Guest did not cancel any reservation at any stage of the reservation for at least a year. Maybe: Not even under extenuating circumstances (I know, it may sound somewhat rude. But again there are guests that a very good at fabricating these extenuating circumstances). Once they do: Goodbye to the badge for at least 1 year!
I could only advice you, when Clara and her team have made their mind up on the supposed qualification criteria. They will first publish their proposal on the Community. So everybody has a chance to have a say on it. And after reviewing the various comments. They can come up with a final verdict.
Again: You just can’t please everybody, all of the time!
My 2-cents 🙂