@Robin4
Yes, I have read your first post and your previous posts as well. I think what you are doing is wonderful. You also live in a city according to wikipedia is 21 miles to the closest biggest city (Adelaide is a lovely place btw, but haven't been the your town) and has a population of 21,554 residents in an area bigger than NYC with all its five boroughs.
Forget the population, the density in a square mile of NYC is 29,030 people. SO to put things in perspective, your entire population is less than the number of people in NYC in a square mile.
The business in NYC do not care about the business Airbnb brings to them. It's smaller than a drop in an ocean. So organizing businesses does not work, and believe me a group in Brooklyn has tried.
So shaming NY area hosts for inaction is really shortsighted I'm afraid.
I think it's wonderful it worked for your area, but you must admit the demographics play a huge role in strategies. So while "no regulation" approach might work in your town, in NYC it leads to bunch of entrepreneurs negotiating with landlords (i.e. offering them higher rents) and using arbitrage to run airbnbs. Again, I doubt airbnb rental arbitrage is a huge issue in Mount Barker, South Australia. It IS a huge issue in NYC including all five boroughs.
As I said, I disagree with the ban of airbnbs, but regulations also allow smaller hosts who just want a little extra income continue. It prevents rental arbitrage, and that's actually a good thing because then live in hosts will have more income when the market is not inundated with cheaper, lower quality accommodations.
So with all due respect, you are assuming too much to say the ball is in my court. What makes you think I'm not involved in process. Just because someone is not playing the game the way you think should be played, does not mean they are not playing at all.
I don't like it when some people on this board keep saying this only applies to US and not to your area, and I'm afraid I'm doing the same thing now, but in my case, I'm making the differentiation based on population density.
I'm pretty sure if you were hosting in Sydney, you would feel differently. Also, just to say, NSW has some good regulations in place. I believe currently hosts can do 180days without being present, but host must be present in the building to do 365 days for greater Sydney area but they can lease all year if they are in less dense areas of NSW. So as you can see, this issue relates to the density and size of a city.
Unfortunately, one size activism does not fit all and it's not a thing.