@Garrett47 Personally, I don't like the "Better suited to a hotel" because it doesn't really tell me anything except that the host wouldn't have them back because they were objectionable in some way. While what this guest did wouldn't be acceptable to any host, some things that hosts might object to aren't necessarily what other hosts would.
For instance, a home-share host might find a guest objectionable because they were totally unsociable, or socially inept, or downright unfriendly, which doesn't work when you are sharing your home. Or they took over the shared kitchen for hours so the host had no space to prepare their own meal. But a host with an entire place listing wouldn't be affected by that.
That doesn't mean you have to go into excruciating detail, and if you mention drugs, that could cause the review to be removed.
But something like "House was left in a disastrous state, bedding was ruined, house rules were disregarded." tells the story without getting into the gritty details.
If the guest is local and you fear some sort of physical retaliation, then "Guest stayed 4 days" tells other hosts you had nothing good to say and the guest would never see that as a bad review.
There's nothing wrong with "Better suited to a hotel", if you feel more comfortable with that, but I like to read a bit more about why.