@Lizzie I agree with @Sarah977's comment, above. I find this post about how to support new hosts (and Corporate's great interest in making things nice and cozy for them) to be somewhat macabre and jarring, given what has happened to David in CO, a long-time super host and valued community member whose account was closed with no explanation after hosting over 1000 guests and maintaining a 4.7 star rating. And he is not the only host in good standing that this has happened to. This has been going on for years, but most hosts understandably have difficulty believing it. Until it happens to them.
Us 'not new' hosts have been pleading (practically begging) for the review system to be revised in a meaningful manner; this was not done. Instead, it appears to have been revised to make it even more damaging to hosts, i.e., a 10 page review with built in 'spy' features is being rolled out without hosts' knowledge (e.g., "Was there toilet paper?" "Was there an oven in the kitchen?") that many guests admit to being too tedious to fill out when hosts later inquire why they did not leave a review. And of course, we need 50% of our guests to leave a review to maintain super host status.
Then there's the fact that our listings can still be devastated by a malicious, retaliatory one-star review, with no apparent recourse. And the security deposit is a 'phantom' deposit that rarely can be received when there are damages. And the 'Host Protection Guarantee' that rarely brings 'Peace of Mind' when a larger claim needs to be filed (a process that is so convoluted and bizarre that most hosts give up and pay for the costly damages themselves). Where is the concern from Corporate about this?
Regarding new hosts: I reported many months ago that when a new listing goes up now, hosts receive red-lettered warnings that they are failing to meeet minimum statistical standards. As an experienced host, I could just roll my eyes and go on with my day; new hosts have already come on to the CC, frantic and confused, wondering why they, as new hosts, are already receiving warnings and being told their listing may be removed. How welcoming and encouraging is that?
As I've mentioned elsewhere, I have been treated wonderfully by Airbnb C/S, historically. But anyone who reads the posts on this CC (this past year, especially) know that many, many hosts are not treated so well, and it seems we are hearing more and more stories that end with the C/S rep saying "It's all computerized now and there is nothing that I or anyone here can do". This mechanized, computerized process fueled by stats and algorithms is fast becoming one that results in the dehumanization of the host; and this bothers me enough that I am reconsidering my relationship with Airbnb, despite my great success on the platform. And I am not the only 'not new' host feeling this way.
I'll look forward to Airbnb Corporate being equally curious about that. (But I won't hold my breath).