My rental is a shared house in California. Do I need to say ...
Latest reply
My rental is a shared house in California. Do I need to say no illegal drugs in my house rules or is that already taken care ...
Latest reply
Hello, after maintaining Superhost status for years, I lost it at the last assessment due to one 3* review (I host long term stays, so every rating really counts). Oh well, never mind...
Since then, all my guests have left 5* and I saw on my dashboard that my rating for the current assessment period (October 21 to September 22) was back up to the 4.8* requirement for Superhost and I was hopeful that I could maintain or increase this going forward.
However, yesterday I noticed my dashboard is now saying the rating is 4.6* for the same period. I haven't received any new reviews in the meantime, nor have any been removed, and anyway, the numbers don't add up. The total for guests who reviewed in that period, including the 3* review, comes to 4.769, so I should have 4.7* at least (or would it round up to 4.8*?). Why is it showing only 4.6*?
Answered! Go to Top Answer
Hi @Huma0 and everyone else,
Thanks again for bringing this to our attention. After some investigation, we can confirm this issue is only impacting a very small number of Hosts. We’re pleased to say the fix will be released by September 16th, at which time you’ll see corrected data in your dashboard, and this issue will not impact any Superhost assessments on October 1.
Thanks again for your patience!
Stephanie
Has anyone else noticed this happening on their dashboard? Any suggestions for why the rating may have gone down?
You are now showing 4.91 & 4.97 respectively.
Yes, that's for the individual listings.
I'm talking about the Superhost stats for the current assessment period (1st October 2021 to 30th September 2022). My rating mysteriously dropped from 4.8* to 4.6* but no new reviews came in, nor were any removed.
I contacted CS about it and got a response very quickly with a screenshot of my ratings that totalled 4.6*. However, that screenshot omitted several 5* reviews within the assessment period. I pointed this out to the rep, but she hasn't responded yet. Hopefully, she's looking into it...
Or, am I totally missing something? Has the assessment period changed from the previous 365 days to the current calendar year, because her screenshot showed the latter and that's what she's saying the 4.6* is based on?
Pardon my French, but FFS. Why even bother? Here is the response I just got from CS:
"Beginning at the 1 April 2022 assessment, and at future assessments, Hosts need to meet all 4 criteria to earn Superhost status.
The 4 criteria are:
Maintaining a 4.8 overall rating
Maintaining a 90% response rate or higher
Hosting 10 stays in the past year (or 100 nights over at least 3 bookings)
Maintaining a cancellation rate of less than 1%
When you become a Superhost, you’re rewarded with a special badge on your profile and listing.
Superhost assessments take place 4 times a year – in January, April, July and October – and each assessment evaluates your performance during the previous 365 days.
More details in this article:
"The latest updates to Superhost assessments"
www.airbnb.co.uk/resources/hosting-homes/a/the-latest-updates-to-superhost-assessments-257
That's why you have overall rating - 4.6
Huma, was it useful information for you? Do you have any more questions?"
What the heck have the other criteria got to do with the 4.6* rating? Anyway, I have 100% response rate, 0% cancellation rate, and way above the minimum number of stays/number of nights requirement.
How does that answer my question of why several 5 star reviews that fall into the assessment period are not being factored into the total?
I do wonder if being a Superhost is worth any of the hassle. I mean, guests see my 4.91* or 4.97* or whatever on the listings (as @Fred13 pointed out) so I guess who cares if Airbnb can't manage to do simple maths and gives me some random overall rating...
Next response from CS was this:
"I will try to explain to you by another way.
At least the 4.91 & 4.97 will not discourage anyone from booking, especially considering one has over 100 reviews. I am beginning to think 4.9 'X' is good enough for most.
Yes, I think the listing stats are the most important. However, my other listing currently only has 4.84* at the moment due to a 3* review a few months ago (also the reason I lost Superhost at the last assessment). It's actually my nicest room, but has always attracted the fussier guests!
However now I am starting to doubt all the stats seeing as neither the Airbnb system, nor the rep I spoke to, can do basic maths.
If I look on the overall quality page and enter the dates for the current assessment, i.e. from 1st October to now, it looks correct and the same as my calculations, i.e. 4.77*. Yet, my Superhost statistics for the same period are still showing at 4.6*.
The $100 super host reward is not adequate to even book a one night stay at most anyplace! They need to adjust the reward. We work hard jumping thru hoops to please our guests, some of which are never pleasable! Sometimes I get marked down for my location - duh! Why did you choose my rental ? Can't they look at a map?! There is not a hotel room around me available in the summer and I am less expensive!
I don't really see the travel award as a big incentive. Hosting is a lot of work and I'm certainly not doing it for $100 a year in the form of a voucher! For a short time, Airbnb introduced a free photo session as an alternative to the travel coupon, which was far more of an incentive from my perspective, but when I tried to claim it, I was denied. They told me it was only for new hosts. If it was only for new hosts, why was it a Superhost reward then? You have to maintain Superhost for a year to get the reward... Soon after, they seemed to scrap that idea.
Anyway, my complaint here is that the Airbnb system seems to have miscalculated my stats and the CS rep I assigned keeps telling me that 2+2=3. It doesn't matter how many times I explain to her that 2+2=4, she just keeps coming back with some patronising answer as if I'm the one being a dimwit and telling me that 2+2 = 3.
Now I know that a lot of CS reps are outsourced, barely trained staff, but we are not talking rocket science here.
That is very frustrating! I have had a similar situation with one cancellation due to us having Covid. They wanted to ding me for it, but I did finally get it resolved. I hope you can get yours corrected. If I wasn't earning so much to pay my taxes I would certainly quit. Good luck.
Thank you!
To be honest, it isn't the end of the world. I was disappointed to lose Superhost status after having it consistently for years, but hey ho, maybe it doesn't mean that much anyway.
What is annoying me is that this is clearly some sort of technical glitch, which should be easy enough to resolve, but the rep keeps denying the figures and telling me that I do not understand.
Maybe it is me who is being stupid, but my last screenshot clearly displays that my calculations are correct.
What is sooo frustrating is that the CS rep cannot seem to grasp really basic information. Thankfully, it is not such an important issue, but what if it was? I can see why so many hosts who post here are tearing their hair out having to deal with this kind of nonsense when they have an urgent or critical situation!
I finally got a response from 'the colleague', which basically didn't give me any details but said that the engineers were working to fix it and it shouldn't take long.
So, as I suspected, it sounds like a technical glitch and at least maybe someone less clueless is looking into it now...
Of ALL the glitches this is the hardest to comprehend. Every single error is blamed on a glitch from missing payouts to automatic cancelations that neither the host nor guest wanted. This is the one basic calculation of the ratings all locked into their own system where cannot even begin to imagine what would be the cause of such a glitch.