Hi all.
I have been following this closely, and have had communication with both Visit Sacramento, who are behind the STID and the city council.
A couple of things to consider.
The STID plan is appalling. I have reviewed similar plans, for example the redevelopment of San Francisco’s Convention center. The plan for Sacramentolooks as if it was put together in a hurry, by folks simply unqualified and inexperienced to do the job properly.
The data and analysis in the plan simply don’t support the key criteria which should allow an infrastructure district to be formed:
1. Benefit will not be equal amongst all who are being assessed (taxed) you do t have to be Einstein to figure hotels closest to the convention center will get the biggest benefit.
2. Others not paying the assessment will benefit: West Sac has a plethora of hotel choices, many identical to those in the proposed district. Of course attendees are just as likely to chose to use these hotels as any other similar hotels that are as close to the convention center.
3. The proposed structure to manage the STID almost ensures Airbnb Hosts won’t get a say. For the next 30 years!
There are about 1,000 Airbnb’s in the Sac region. In an act of complete contempt for Airbnb hosts, Visit Sacramento have knowingly chosen not to communicate this plan with about 800 of them.
Please follow up with city hall, or Visit Sacramento.
This plan doesn’t merit support for the formation of the STID.
Arguably what they are doing is illegal.