@Anonymous @Kath9 @Sarah
Andrew, I do have issues with him but, don't completely write what he says off. People see what they want to see....they will always search for the weakest link in any argument!
I, in my working life was a mechanical services contractor, I dealt with CFC's (Chlorofluorocarbons) in the form of refrigerant gases.......R10 up to R301c and into the advent of R410A
CFC's are solely responsible for the degradation of the Ozone Layer ....that layer around the earth which protects us from......global warming. The Ozone layer keeps incoming UV (Ultra violet radiation) under control.
Co2 emmisions account for a miniscule amount of damage but Andrew, my question is....if this goose knows what he is talking about, why did he pick on Co2 and tell us how good this stuff is instead of CFC's where he would have had a legitimate argument to get across?
He is telling us everything is ok because we aren't hurting anything.....but mate, that's bull, we are, we are destroying our environment and gooses like this leading us down blind alleys don't help the cause of mankind.
This is purely a political statement on behalf of the Australian 'Greens' movement in order to embarrass both the mainstream political parties to their own advantage.
And that is why it is still worth a laugh or two! It's not that he is wrong, he is barking up the wrong tree!!!
Cheers......Rob