Hi Jamie,
Your frustration is completely valid, and it seems like Airbnb’s decision hinges on a technicality rather than the full context of the situation. Since you disclosed the presence of a cat in your communication with the guest before the booking, it's clear that the guest had the necessary information to make an informed decision. This was not a matter of misleading or withholding details.
The issue likely stems from Airbnb’s reliance on the written listing description as the definitive source of information. While it's not explicitly required to mention pets in a listing unless they are present during the guest’s stay, the absence of this detail can sometimes leave room for misunderstandings, as in this case.
Airbnb's decision to side with the guest may have been influenced by their policies favoring guest satisfaction in allergy-related claims, even though the flat was professionally cleaned and the cat was not on the premises during their stay. The guest’s awareness of the situation prior to booking should weigh heavily in your favor.
I recommend to gather all your communication with the guest and escalate your case through Airbnb’s resolution center or social media channels. Highlight that the guest knew about the cat, chose to book despite this, and only raised the issue upon arrival, which suggests a lack of genuine intent to stay.
In future, including a brief mention of a pet in the listing, even if it’s not on-site during a guest’s stay, could help prevent similar situations. This unfortunate experience could also serve as a point to advocate for clearer host guidance on disclosing such details in listings.
I hope this helps.
All the best,
Upfish Management