Many of you have told us how much you love sharing your s...
Latest reply
Many of you have told us how much you love sharing your space with guests. Beyond the financial rewards, you’re inspired b...
Latest reply
Many of you rely on reviews to grow your business—they highlight your amazing hospitality. They’re also a helpful way to get specific feedback on what you’re doing well as a host and where you can improve. But there are times when you feel like a review may be misleading or irrelevant to future guests, and we know that can be painful both personally and professionally.
It’s tricky. Guests and hosts need to be able to share what they feel is important about their experience, so we don’t want to limit what people can and can’t say on the platform. However, it’s also essential that reviews reflect a guest’s stay and that they provide useful information to future hosts and guests. As part of our ongoing journey to get this balance right, here are some of the changes we’re making:
With our updated Review Policy—effective December 11, 2019—we’ve addressed two types of reviews that we know can be frustrating: irrelevant reviews and biased reviews. The updated policy clarifies our expectations and ensures our customer support agents are equipped to remove these types of reviews.
By updating our policy to cover irrelevant and biased reviews, we’re strengthening our commitment to building a community of trust. These review updates build upon our existing Content Policy (which outlines the kind of content that is never allowed on Airbnb) and our new Guest Standards Policy, which will introduce a system for tracking bad guests. Under our updated Review Policy, guests and hosts who repeatedly leave certain kinds of biased reviews may be removed from the platform.
Let’s look at irrelevant reviews and biased reviews in a little more detail:
Reviews that are irrelevant
This policy covers situations where a review contains information that’s irrelevant to you as a host or your listing—and isn’t useful to future guests.
Here are a few examples:
Under the updated policy, both of those reviews would be removed because they contain only irrelevant info.
There are also times when a guest comments on issues outside of your control, or unrelated to the service you provided. Those types of reviews may be removed if they only contain irrelevant content that isn’t useful to future guests. Here are a few examples of irrelevant content that could result in the removal of a review:
These comments have nothing to do with your listing or the service you provide as a host and aren’t useful to future guests. So, under our updated Review Policy, our customer support agents would be empowered to remove both the review content and star rating.
Reviews with biased information
Our community benefits most when reviews share an unbiased view of the member’s experience. Our updated Review Policy covers the removal of reviews with inappropriate bias—this may include situations where the reviewer is attempting to extort the person being reviewed, has a conflict of interest, or competes with the person being reviewed. Here’s a closer look at three types of biased reviews that will be removed under our updated policy:
Guests and hosts who repeatedly violate our updated Review Policy may face consequences, including account suspension and removal from the platform. We’ve also invested in retraining our customer support agents and improving our workflows, so hosts will receive better support in instances when irrelevant or biased reviews happen. As with our new Guest Standards Policy that tracks bad guests, our updated Review Policy includes warnings and education that can lead to suspension or removal of people who repeatedly leave biased reviews.
Updating our Review Policy is another important step in our journey of supporting guests and hosts like you who rely on relevant, useful reviews.
What kinds of reviews will be removed by this updated Review Policy?
A healthy review system is one that respects and protects our community’s genuine feedback. For that reason, we take the removal of any review very seriously and only remove reviews that clearly violate Airbnb’s Review Policy. You can read the updated Review Policy in full, but, in short, this means a review is only removed if:
Guests and hosts who repeatedly violate our updated Review Policy may face consequences, including account suspension and removal from the platform.
What kind of documentation should I have under the updated Review Policy?
We can’t emphasize this enough: Always aim to communicate with guests through the Airbnb platform. If conversations happen off-platform, be sure to keep a record of those conversations too. That way, if you ever need to report a review to our agents, they’ll have—at their fingertips—the information they need to make the right decision. That said, even when you don’t have this preferred documentation, we encourage you to report any reviews that violate our Review Policy because we may be able to identify other evidence or patterns of behavior regarding that guest.
Will all irrelevant review content be removed?
If Airbnb determines that the review contains no relevant information about a host or guest or listing, the review will be removed. Reviews that contain mostly irrelevant information are also subject to removal, but only where the relevant information does not meaningfully inform community members.
Where a review contains information that is unrelated to an experience as a host or guest, or is focused on something beyond the control of the person being reviewed, our team will determine the relevance of the review by considering how useful it is to our community of hosts and guests. To do this, we’ll look at two things:
What’s the difference between extortionary and retaliatory reviews?
It’s considered extortion if a guest attempts to use reviews (or review responses) to force a host to do something they aren’t obligated to do. So, for example, if a guest threatens to leave a bad review if you don’t allow them to bring additional guests, that review would be extortionary and would be removed under the updated policy.
Then there are times when a host may feel that a negative review is made in retaliation. This is when, for example, a host doesn’t allow the guest to bring additional guests, and the guest goes on to leave a review about how inflexible their host was, or even writes a negative review about cleanliness or location. However, without evidence of a threat to leave a negative review, this would not be considered extortionary and would not be removed under the updated policy. If this happens, we encourage hosts to use their public response to politely address the issue.
Why aren’t you removing all retaliatory reviews?
While we understand how frustrating it can be when you receive a review that feels retaliatory, we don’t have a crystal ball to tell us what a person’s true motivations are. So, without a documented threat to leave a negative review or other evidence of a biased review, Airbnb won’t intervene. Here’s why:
To reiterate, as outlined in our updated Review Policy, Airbnb can—and will—intervene where there’s evidence of a threat, promise of action that’s dependent on the review, or other conflict of interest and/or competition. Additionally, we will continue to intervene when a guest leaves a review that violates our content policies—including discriminatory content or a violent threat.
For more information, read the updated Review Policy or learn more about how we moderate disputes of our Review Policy in our Help Center.
Sometimes, a negative review is less about the guest’s experience in your space and more about them not understanding how reviews or the platform work—they can even be the result of an honest mistake. Earlier this year, we built a tool to help address these types of reviews by automatically detecting inconsistencies, and then interrupting the flow to give guests a chance to correct them. So, for example, if a guest gives you 4 or 5 stars in every category (cleanliness, accuracy, and so on) but then a 1-, 2-, or 3-star rating overall, a pop-up will ask if they’re sure about their overall rating.
Similarly, if a guest leaves a low rating for something like location or value—two categories we know can be interpreted differently by guests—a clarifying question will appear.
These interruptions force guests to think a little more about the rating they’re giving, which they can then go back and correct. As a result, we’re already seeing more consistency between the category scores and overall scores. Improvements like these help ensure that guests’ ratings align with their experience—better ratings are more useful to guests and reward the hard work of hosts.
Reviews are the backbone of our community—they help hosts grow their businesses, and they help guests gain the confidence they need to make the booking. We have a dedicated team doing lots of thinking around how to make our entire review experience better for hosts and guests. We’ll continue to improve the review system over time—please keep sending us your feedback about improvements that you’d like to see. In the meantime, we’re excited about these changes and hope you are too.
I find some guest give a 4 star review simply because they "never give 5 stars" Annoying when you have done everything right. What can be done about this? These are likely the same guests that take in account star rating when choosing their place to stay.
I see hosts with "levels". Can someone explain what this is?
This does nothing. I have had reviews poorly written as guests have asked to have other guests in. I don’t allow it and with today’s issues, It’s a security as well as a privacy issue. Airbnb was told and I had proof in text messages that the guest asked. Airbnb did nothing and doesn’t even listen most of the time. Your new policy is useless! Not impressed. I have had to tighten up on rules to protect my home and property. I am thinking of not using auto book and will pick and choose who I want to book. Also. We should always be allowed to have pics. This is our property, it’s not a hotel. We should have more control.
Reviews where guests fail to read the description of the listing then later complain and review negatively should also be removed. For example, in the description you say the house has No television. The guest fails to read this and later leaves a negative review for lack of a television. It is unfair to the host because the guest had an option of choosing a place with a television but they chose yours knowing there’s no television and later give a poor rate based on this.
If it has been stated in the description, the host should not be penalised for it.
According to another platform i also use to sell accommodation on that tracks how much information a traveler checks out they typically only read 20% of a description - maybe re confirm with a guest after they book explaining you don't have a tv so this doesn't happen - I know you should not have to do this but it would avoid anymore negative reviews for their stupidity.
Good job.
love the work you do and how you really take care of hosts and guests!! thank you,
Diana Ford
Of the many issues I have with how reviews are handled, the one on my mind right now is that guests can give five stars in all categories but four stars (or fewer) overall. How does that even begin to make sense?
This has happened to me, too. The first year I rented (2010) and that 4-star review stays on my site FOREVER.
I hope if Airbnb is changing its policies on removing irrelevant or biased (or just plain dumb) reviews, they will make it retroactive and get rid of 9-year-old reviews that are irrelevant, biased, or just plain dumb!
I kind of feel like you should re-evaluate your policy that anything under five stars is bad. Or else let guests know that. It’s kind of a silly standard. Your Superhost requirements are fine, but I just don’t think that four stars should be a negative review.
Also I don’t really think that letting guests who don’t stay leave a review is ever particularly accurate. What are they reviewing?
Great article relating to review policies. We as hosts (Certain there are a lot more in our situation), have a 4 x Guest accommodation and we find this an ongoing challenge were guests either knowingly or unknowingly fail to select additional guests for the booking. It is a continuous battle to relate this importance to guests and more often guests try and dodge the selection of additional guest and when found guilty of doing so, have a biased opinion when leaving a review. How can we work around this?
We have been lucky and mostly get lovely guests and good reviews for our room w/ bath in our house, but there are always a few that are frustrating. What usually gets marked down is location (we put the mileage to downtown and tourist area and airport or bus station in our listing, but I find many people do not read the whole listing), so it's no surprise. We had one person mark us down because the GPS on her airport rental car didn't work, and she had a hard time finding the house (5 minutes away, and I give explicit directions from all directions, highways, airport, etc in my email to them before they come...obviously she hadn't read any of it). Also that it was too dark to see the house number, which has a light right next to it. When we get 4 stars for value...I'm not sure about that, either. I guess they expect us to charge $30/night. Especially when area hotels are $200-$300/night.
What I find mostly, is that guests do not understand what the reviews mean. We get a fabulous review...they had a great time, loved the place, we were so welcoming and flexible, etc... and then they will give 4 stars overall. Who knows why? I will ask in response, but they don't take the time to respond, ever. I think many people don't realize that to airbnb, 4 stars is bad! All we have to do is get 3 of those, and we lose our superhost status, no matter how good the written reviews are. I have spoken to many friends who use airbnb, and they had NO idea about that. They said they would often leave a 4-star review if it was less than a 5-star HOTEL experience, or for some other small thing. After I explain, they all say they will never do that again. So I think airbnb has to be more clear about how they word the review requests, and be more clear what the reviews mean to the hosts.
What I do not understand is being asked to leave a review when a guest has cancelled before even checking in. About the only thing you can review them on is communication, yet the prompts take you through every area as if they actually stayed with you. This needs to be changed.
@Shannon42 wrote:the only thing you can review them on is communication, yet the prompts take you through every area
I am 100% in agreement with you here... Communication only or not allowed at all - It's not rocket science 😉
When a guest books there is a map that gives the exact location, so why would we as hosts be given a poor review based on location? If the guest didn't like the area they should have either looked at that before or suck it up and not book your area again. This category seems ridiculous.