Yeah, that's what I thought "or" meant. I kept trying to explain that to the case manager and she just kept cutting me off and repeating the same line to me.
In this case I'm talking about defamatory content. Based on my understanding of the law, at least in my state, if I can provide evidence that shows beyond reasonable doubt that a guest posted something that is categorically false and has the potential to harm my reputation, it's their responsibility to take the content down.
But, so far, they're not even interested in seeing the evidence that I have, saying that it's the guest's "right" to post whatever they want.
In general terms, they're right, and I wouldn't ask them to take down content that was merely negative or was untrue in a more subjective way, but I think that it's reasonable for me to ask them to take down something that constitutes libel, especially given that: a) libel is illegal, and b) their policy forbids illegal content.
What surprised me is that I've spoken to three case managers and they haven't even tried to argue that the statement didn't constitute libel and that they haven't even indicated a commitment to removing reviews that contain blatent falsehoods. Like, if a guest wrote that my description was innacurate and my room was in a brothel, or that my furniture was all bolted to the ceiling, does that get to stay up too?