That is a good point about saying "surveillance cameras." I used the terminology "external security system" because I found that wording listed on several other listings, thought it sufficient, and also read that many hosts said they wish they had installed security cameras because something bad had happened with guests at their house. Previously, I myself, was the "external security system". I thought that would alert people into following the house rules. The cameras are mounted outside the house, only facing the road/driveway. Really meant to monitor how many people are there. (to be sure of no parties).
I naively thought no one would ever actually bring a dog when the rules clearly state no animals due to allergies.
And that's good advice about requesting payment for disinfection. And interesting about the Security Fee not being acknowledged. Seems rather unfair to a host to have to pay for a guests blatant disregard resulting in damage to the hosts property.
It was real-time at 9:58 pm, and it would have taken me a few minutes to get to the house, but I didn't want to creep-out the guest who rented the house by messaging her as soon as I saw the dog. And it was dark out.
Before installing the cameras, I had to decide that it was the best thing to do or not. I know of a host who had her house completely destroyed. She wasn't even far away, but never checked on it. There ended up being a huge party, and they caused thousand's of dollars worth of real damage. That host's house is big, like mine, so I got nervous and decided to install cameras. But I do believe that guests are inherently good, and so far my renting has been great.
She is at the house until Sunday. Do you think it would be ok if I message her and say my neighbor was getting the mail and saw a woman walking her dog on the property and remind her that dogs are not allowed? Because of the real-time which the incident occurred, it is clear that the dog will be spending staying there.
Thanks for all your input! I really appreciate it!