@Sam397
I believe I did answer the question on two counts:
a) informing you that I accepted a woman with a similar face (only profile showing as mentioned).
b) I considered the Reservation Request on the basis which I always do, namely, whether it was suitable to my circumstances at the time.
If these are not straight answers, then I'm not sure what is? Because obviously I'm informing you that I would accept a person with any photo depending on whether I'm happy with the result of my vetting, (no Instant Book for me), so content to accept a request, and the circumstances are ok for me.
The real question is if one would accept a Guest without having the chance to view their profile at the point of contact? Based on my own experience of very few blank profiles, it always dependent as above.
But if this is to become the norm, and given my aversion to the new rule, it may actually cause a constriction in acceptance rate, predominantly limited to those who have a track record of reviews, in which case one can also still see Guest profile photo if they have reciprocated review for preceding hosts. -- I have set the photo after booking request, but it may not get to that stage as often as before.
In my estimation, Airbnb have just created a new 'prejudicial' situation to replace the one they perceived, whereby Guests can freely see Host profile, but not vice-versa, at the point of contact. The original model evidently worked very well in the majority of cases judging by the global expansion of the company in less than a decade. But this new rule judging by responses on CC is going to make many-many hosts very cagey to deal with new requests.
Last but not least, I believe the new rule predominantly affects live-in Hosts far more than absentees who do not have to interact on a daily basis or share facilities with Guests in their home; as well as the salaried professional agents who care far less about rentals of properties and home that are not theirs.