I am new to this, so if some kind person could explain if I am mistaken, but it seems that if my status is partly determined by how many people view my listing and then book, if my place is full, then people are not going to see my listing--it is already booked. We opened our place a few months ago and have been full except for a week. We are very pleased with how things have gone and are opening up another unit soon, but we cannot get 10 stays if someone is our guest for several months. We are happy that they enjoy our place, and we are grateful, don't get me wrong, but the algorithm is mixed up. We aspire to SuperHost status, of course, but how can we best achieve it if we are always full? Yet Isn't that the point?
Also, if a guest asks a question and I respond right away, I get some sort of star on my forehead (I am not sure how this factors into my status, so feel free to explain, please). If the guest ends with another message like, "Have a nice day," do I have to respond to that, because if I do this exchange could go on forever!
Another problem is people who do not leave reviews. Clearly our first guest liked our place because he wanted to rebook after a week, but someone got in ahead of him. He was sad to leave, but he did not leave a review. How can we encourage people to leave a review, and how is it fair for the algorithm to judge us on something we have no power over? Particularly picky people are also unfair and likely have no idea how their pickiness affects us, even when we strive to make their stay a 5-star experience. Our only overly choosy guest so far was miffed because our town doesn't have enough restaurants for his liking. It is a small town known for its good food. He stayed for a month and apparently ran out of places to eat. This is clearly out of our control. Such is the life . . . .
Anyhow, any light shed on these issues and the nuances of SuperHost status would be most appreciated.
Thanks, from A. Newbie