@Letti0 @Cor3 @Pete28 @Branka-and-Silvia0
My post was just a bit 'tongue in cheek' Letti!
Sure, we all know what the requirements are for a Plus listing, and the blurb indicates that, if, (after a rigurous vetting program where no stone is left unturned), the host exceeds the bar that Airbnb set to be a 'succesful' Airbnb host, the program may accept them....well that's what it infers Letti......
But, I just do a bit of looking and, sure there are Superhosts a plenty with hundreds of reviews, obviously very successful hosts. But, rubbing shoulders with those great hosts and properties there is also a sizeable number of approved Plus hosts like this....
This host has 8 reviews in total of which 3 have been in the past 12 months and nowhere on the hosts profile does it indicate there are reviews for other properties.
How does that meet those stringent entry requirements Letti? It's not as though the host simply lost a heap of reviews....from what we read on the listing page, they never had the required minimum to start with! And the Plus team would have to approve this listing to publish it...well wouldn't they?
Or what about this one!
Just 7 reviews over the past 12 months of which one was a host cancellation!!! How on earth does that work Letti.
These are 'Featured' Plus properties, not just ones that happened slip though the cracks and lurk around the bottom of the Plus listings. If you Scroll Shepherds Bush London Plus properties these come up in the featured 25....the 25 standout Airbnb properties in London, I didn't pull them out of thin air, go and check!.
So Letti, you can talk on about 'Airbnb hospitality standards' and 'full list of requirements', quote links from here and there, yep, we know what those are but......
The reality seems to fall considerably short of the rhetoric!
Cheers......Rob