Retaliatory and Misleading Review After Guest Requested Full Refund

Retaliatory and Misleading Review After Guest Requested Full Refund

Hello Airbnb Community,

 

I wanted to share a recent experience I had that I feel highlights a gap in how hosts, superhosts included, are protected—especially when trying to handle emergency situations responsibly and transparently.

 

A guest left a 1-star review filled with false claims, after I declined to issue a second full refund following a carbon monoxide (CO) alarm incident. Here's the full context:

 

During their stay, the guest initially said everything was great, other than mentioning there was animal poop in the non-fenced yard. Three days into their stay, the CO alarm went off and the fire department responded. I was in direct contact with both the guest and the fire services within minutes. Out of caution, the guest decided not to stay, and I fully supported their decision. I offered to find alternative accommodations, opened a liability case with Airbnb, and the platform appropriately delisted my property until I could provide documentation showing everything was safe. I appreciated Airbnb taking safety seriously.

 

The very next day, I had the fire department, HVAC specialists, and the energy company out—all of whom confirmed there was no CO present. I refunded the guest from the night of the incident through the rest of their stay, along with 50% of the cleaning fee. They accepted it.

 

However, after speaking with Airbnb liability, the guest's tone changed dramatically. They began demanding a full refund, including for nights they stayed and the full cleaning fee. They also claimed (falsely) that CO had been present throughout their stay and threatened legal action. At this point, liability advised me to stop communicating directly with the guest. Airbnb support confirmed that the guest had contacted both liability and support asking for more compensation, but both declined their request.

 

Shortly after, the guest left a harsh 1-star review, accusing me of endangering their life, stating things like, "Horrible to work with even in a tragedy. Got charged for Saturday night and didn't even stay that night fore department had us evacuate. ", claiming I charged them for the night of the alarm (which is untrue—I explained the refund breakdown in full detail). She even used the rating system incorrectly, giving 1 star for communication and location based on unrelated or exaggerated complaints (like poop in a yard and refund disagreements).

 

In her private review she wrote: "But they got their money so they could care less. And charged for the Saturday we got told to leave property by firefighters."—again, false. The fire department documents confirm she was not forced to leave; it was her decision.

 

To make things worse, after her stay I found that her dog had urinated all over the carpet and a bed, they broke a blind, and removed and broke the gas fireplace logs.

 

I contacted Airbnb about the review, explaining it was clearly retaliatory. The response I got was generic, and support refused to remove it. I asked them plainly:

 

"I just want to be clear—Airbnb is determining that her private review statement, 'they got their money so they could care less,' is not considered retaliatory, even though it directly references not receiving an additional refund?"

No one ever answered me.

 

I followed all protocols, worked with Airbnb and emergency services, refunded fairly, and treated the guest with empathy. I feel I did everything right—and yet I’m left with a review that’s both inaccurate and retaliatory, and no support from the platform.

 

If this kind of situation doesn’t qualify for Airbnb’s review protection policy, I’d really love advice on how to protect myself as a host in the future. I’m feeling disheartened and hope Airbnb can do better in supporting those of us who do everything we can to keep guests safe.

 

Thank you for reading.

3 Replies 3

@Nicole3749 

So sorry this happened...

 

What did the fire department determine was the reason for the false CO2 alarm? Was the battery dying? Was the alarm defective? Have you corrected the problem? These would be my concerns as a future guest.

 

Hindsight is 20/20, but since Airbnb has received widespread negative media coverage for CO2 poisoning deaths in several Airbnbs, I think it would have been best to refund the entire stay (including the entire cleaning fee) as compensation for a significant disruption in this guest's stay. Not doing so probably guaranteed a negative review. Even with a full refund you still might have received a negative review, but at least you could have said you provided a full refund in your public response. Not providing a full refund (including the cleaning fee) may be perceived by future guests as more of a negative than if you had provided a full refund. I would have also included what you have done to prevent a future occurrence with the CO2 alarm. This would reassure future guests. Your reply just said it was "resolved" but as a future guest, I would like more details about that. Did you remove the "defective" CO2 alarm? Was the new one tested and verfied to be working properly?

 

The guest also claimed there were paper towels stacked next to a water heater? 

 

You could have filed a resolution claim for the other damages, but I would have just let that go considering the circumstances and just mention it in the review (which you did).

Hi Joan,

 

Following my discussion with the fire chief and a review of their report, it’s clear that the fire department could not determine a definitive cause—they were only able to speak in terms of potential probabilities. I also want to clarify that this was not considered a false alarm. I fully acknowledge that the incident occurred, and we took responsibility at the time, following all of Airbnb’s protocols and recommendations.

 

We take guest safety very seriously. The property is equipped with multiple CO alarms, smoke detectors, fire extinguishers, and fire blankets throughout. While it’s impossible to prevent every emergency, we’ve taken all reasonable measures to provide a safe environment.

 

Regarding the guest’s request, both Airbnb and our liability provider confirmed they denied her secondary refund request. I reached out to both parties directly to confirm, and their responses were consistent. What I hoped would be recognized is that the guest initially wished to continue their stay. It was only after the refund was denied that they chose to leave the review in question and mentioning that "they got their money" as a point. That shift in communication is the real turning point here.

 

What’s been most frustrating is the lack of direct responses from Airbnb—only receiving generic replies to specific concerns. My hope is that this discussion can ultimately help other hosts enhance their safety protocols. I’m incredibly grateful that we had the proper equipment in place when this happened.

 

As for the alarm trigger, the HVAC technician indicated the most likely cause was a combination of paper towels and the gas fireplace, which the guests had tampered with by removing the logs. As a precaution, we replaced the water heater, as it was the only original appliance remaining and seemed the most likely contributing factor. We also had all gas sources tested by both the energy company and a licensed HVAC technician. The technician also noted that all gas appliances—including heaters, grills, stoves, and fireplaces—emit some level of CO as a result of burning gas.

 

Please let me know if you need anything further.

To further clarify the sequence of events:

 

  1. The incident occurred, and we took appropriate measures at the time, including offering to help the guests find alternative accommodations.

  2. The guest accepted the initial refund offer.

  3. They later asked to resume their stay.

  4. Due to Airbnb’s safety protocols—which I fully support—the property was temporarily delisted, so resuming their stay was not an option.

  5. The guest then spoke with both liability and Airbnb resolutions to request a full refund, which was denied.

  6. Following that, the guest repeatedly contacted me directly seeking a secondary refund, citing that CO was present throughout the stay.

  7. I explained the reason for the initial refund, which aligned with both Airbnb and liability support’s decisions.

  8. After those communications, the guest left the review in question.

When confirming Airbnb’s and liability’s stance on the second refund, I made it clear that I would follow their advice and decisions completely.

More tools to help you meet your goals

Resource Center

Explore guides for hospitality, managing your listing, and growing your business.